10,000
Years of Freedom
by
Ed
Dedelow
Seeking political solutions
to government excess is playing Russian
roulette with the future. The problem
with government is that there are too
many politicians running it. And, they
will continue to govern until we put philosophical
ideals in the background and precede them
with standards based in mathematical analysis.
We need solutions that can be used for
the next Ten Thousand years. I believe
unequivocally in the existence of basic
economic law.
People,
whether right or left, eventually explain
their beliefs with philosophical idealism.
America's Founding Fathers created a Constitution
that gave us a road map to freedom, but
nowhere in the Constitution is there a
road map for economic development. The
Constitution neither included the terms
Capitalism or Free Enterprise nor, excluded
the words Socialism and Communism. Unless
we define explicit economic laws that
limit us to demonstrable concepts, Capitalism,
Communism and Socialism are left on the
same plane, with an incremental and inevitable
drift towards the latter.
Surgeons
can perform intricate heart procedures
through insertions in the groin, yet economists
have not devised generally accepted procedures
to stabilize and grow an economy. Better
health, the poor, the environment and
preservation of nature are key political
issues. Unfortunately, solutions to these
problems are derived via politics based
in either misguided philosophy or leadership
that legislates to satisfy a diverse "enemy
of my enemy is my friend" based constituency.
Too
many people are resigned to the ultimate
downfall of freedom reflected in the often
repeated and unsupported Benjamin Franklin
quote: "When the people find they can
vote themselves money, that will herald
the end of the republic." We do not need
a defeatist attitude that accepts this
as our eventual downfall. What we need
are answers that will ensure Freedom for
the next 10,000 years.
Socialism
is the last challenge to individual rights.
It is constantly and incrementally encroaching
on our freedom. Socialism is a cancer
that grows and eventually destroys its
host and that host is freedom. We must
protect against this, and to do that we
need economic law.
What can the math show?
1. Wealth cannot be divided:
Wealth can be destroyed by confiscation
or excessive taxes. In the extreme, if
government can confiscate all assets,
assets have no value. High taxes and regulation
correspondingly reduce an asset's value,
the prospects of investment and the ability
to replace assets. When businesses are
subjected to increasing taxes, the only
avenue for survival is a reduction of
labor costs. Thus, when taxes increase
or regulation is imposed, the money politicians
think is being divided really comes from
the workers, not the owners. In other
words, dividing the wealth involves taking
from the working/producing group and giving
it to a politician's favored few. It is
merely a means to buy votes. The "division
of wealth" causes an endless cycle of
need - followed by politician's greed
- followed by a greater need.
Since
the Great Society of the 1960s, nearly
50 years ago, politicians have vigorously
legislated to divide the wealth with the
result that we now have an even greater
division between rich and poor. Had the
money and effort been expended on expanding
the economy, I doubt anyone on earth would
be starving and the Cold War would have
ended 10 years earlier. Our example would
have established the guidance to solve
the earth's difficulties.
2. The burden of government falls on the
backs of the working population. Businesses
are rewarded for managing production.
Part of production is the burden of government
and, as such, businesses profit from the
government burden. Entire industries are
created from the management of government
imposed obligations.
3. A developed country should
balance its trade. The United States provides
for far too many of its needs with imports
and pays for them with paper dollars.
This has worked in a world needing a currency;
the world, however, has grown weary of
the exchange.
Other concepts that can
be proven include: